Abraham begot Isaac...Jacob begot Joseph...

by Erasmo Leiva-Merikakis


Commemoration of the 14,000 Infants (Holy Innocents) Slain by Herod in Bethlehem

Anno Domini 2023, December 29

Abraham begot Isaac… ~St. Matthew 1:2

Matthew calls his whole book the βίβλος γενέσεως of Jesus Christ, the book of the “genesis” of His ancestors, of His birth, of His coming among us and its manner, which reveals the promise He holds for us. How fitting that the first sentence of the canonical New Testament, the story of man’s re-creation through the grace of Christ, should contain the word “genesis,” which hearkens back to the first creation of the world out of nothingness. The Virgin Mary is called the βίβλος τοῦ λόγου τῆς ζωῆς (the “book of the Word of life”) by the Greek Church (idiomelon for Great Vespers of the Feast of the Nativity of the Theotokos, Sep 8). The book of the Gospel, the book of Christ’s origins and life, can be written and proclaimed because God has first written His living Word in the living book of the Virgin’s being, which she has offered to her Lord in all its purity and humility—the whiteness of a chaste, empty page. If the name of Mary does not often appear in the pages of the Gospel as evident participant in the action, it is because she is the human ground of humility and obedience upon which every letter of Christ’s life is written. She is the Theotokos, too, in the sense that she is the book that bears, and is inscribed with, the Word of God. She keeps her silence that He might resonate the more plainly within her.


Christ’s genealogy, His entering the human condition and being born a man like us, is indeed the genesis of redemption. The orderly enumeration of the generations imposes a strict symmetry that draws attention to the providential preparation of Christ’s advent through the centuries: the whole history of Israel is seen in retrospect as having led up to the Savior’s Incarnation and birth. God creates and transforms from what He had already created; He does not contradict Himself, nor does He scrap everything at a troubled moment in order to start again “from scratch.” His Son is born within time from a race of saints, sinners, ruffians, exiles, wise men, poets, quarrelers. Even David, the Hebrew letters of whose name add up to the number fourteen and thus determine the structure of Jesus’ genealogy (three sets of fourteen generations each), was not only a great king, poet, and lover of God but also a great sinner—a murderer and a slave to his lusts.


Generation after generation, the father begets his son. The latter, in the accusative case as the grammatical object of the verb, is always the passive recipient of life. Suddenly, arriving at Christ the Lord, the genealogy changes its narrative mode: Jesus becomes the active subject of the sentence. We do not read here that “Joseph begat Jesus” or even that “Mary gave birth to Jesus,” although this latter statement is certainly true. Matthew wants to emphasize that the birth of Jesus occurs, not simply as a result of human reproduction, “from the will of man,” as St. John says (1:13), but from God and by the deliberate intervention of God. Thus we read (v. 16) that “Jesus, called the Messiah, took his birth from Mary,” as a king undertakes an action with sovereign freedom. Christ, the sun of justice, comes forth from Mary “like a bridegroom from His chamber and like an athlete hopeful to run His course” (Ps. 18:6).


Jacob begot Joseph the husband of Mary, from whom Jesus was born. ~St. Matthew 1:16

The name of the Lord suddenly emerges at the very end of the sentence in the nominative case as free and lordly subject of action, concluding the three lists of fourteen generations each. The nominative [subject] supplants the accusative [object], and divine intervention supplants the order of nature. From within the darkness of the world and the vicissitudes of history, and yet rooted in them, the Word of God leaps forth as if by His own deliberate design. History has been for Him. Both the faith of Abraham and the royalty of David—who sum up the whole genealogy already in verse 1—are united and fulfilled in Christ. While, in human generation, it is always the ancestors who ennoble the name of their descendants, in the case of Christ it is this latest comer into the world who makes even His most obscure ancestor famous and reveals the reason-for-being of the whole line. Who, after all, were Shealtiel and Abiud and Zadok for their names to have been inscribed on the first page of the most extraordinary literary document of all time? And if the Word of God waited for forty-two generations in order to com “when time had taken a downward plunge” (cursu declivi temporis), as the Advent hymn has it, it is because God, like a good physician, comes when He is most needed: somehow, to be fully rejuvenated, the world first had to grow old utterly and come to the limit of its own foolish hopes. Christ is sent by the Father into the world “to liberate the human race from its state of decrepitude” (Collect, first Saturday of Advent).


But, at the same time, what tremendous dignity God acknowledges mankind to possess when He reveals to it a mystery that has been contained within the very fiber and flesh of generation after generation! God reveals to man not only the being of God: God reveals man to himself in all his hidden possibilities. Who could have foreseen that a woman of our race could become the mother of the eternal God’s only Son? Who could have suspected humanity’s hidden talent to be able to bear God, not as a cup bears water or as the hand bears a weight, but in the most intimate, physiological sense possible: as a mother bears her child, with everything that implies for the interpenetration of two beings? And so we sing at Midmorning Prayer during Epiphany Week: “The mystery that had been hidden for ages and generations has now become manifest.”


Without knowing it, each of us is a bearer of mystery like Shealtiel, Abiud, and Zadok, even though we are even more anonymous than they. Each of us, too, is caught up in a genealogy, both biological and spiritual, and we each bear the tremendous Mystery that is the personal presence of God among us and within us. As the early Christians like to style themselves, we are “theophores.” In time God does reveal to us, too, what He had hidden in us from the beginning. But who has the patience to await this revelation in silence? Truly, we are almost wholly ignorant of who we are and what promises sleep deep within us.


Joseph is said to be the husband of Mary, “from what Christ was born [ἐγεννήθη].” Christ comes forth sovereignly from Mary. The primacy the fathers hold in every other generation passes here to the woman, the mother, who until now had been treated as mere medium for her husband’s fatherhood. God, for His part, appears as supremely free both in choosing to use human history to prepare His Son’s advent and also in His regal autonomy from the cycle of human generation. Christ is a Jew, and also the one Son of the only God. He belongs to time while not ceasing to be eternal. He is at once mortal and immortal, the holy bearer and personification of God’s mystery of condescension and salvation. (59-61)


*Erasmo Leiva-Merikakis, Fire of Mercy, Heart of the Word: Meditations on the Gospel according to Saint Matthew, Vol. 1 (Chapters 1-11) (San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1996), pp. 57-61.

Share this Post on Your Preferred Platform

By Mark C. Watney August 25, 2026
Inside the head of my three-month-old granddaughter, Lucy, said G.K. Chesterton is, "a new universe, as new as it was on the seventh day of creation...a new system of stars, new grass, new cities...and new seas." And this is because, he adds: The gravity of astonishment at the universe...dwells in the eyes of a baby three-months-old [and] the universe is put upon its trial and forces us actually to remodel our conduct...we seem to be dealing with a new race, only to be seen through a microscope...[with] delightful bulbous heads, three times too big for the body. But Chesterton's central thesis in this essay is not that babies are so marvelous, but that our treatment of each other as adults, in contrast, is so broken. "It is our attitude towards grown-up people that is wrong," he writes, because we no longer see each other with astonishment and wonder (unless, that is, we are falling in love). But babies remind us that humans really are astonishing, and this "revolutionary theory of the marvelousness of all things" should force us to "remodel our conduct" toward everyone we meet. A baby seems to be a necessary icon for us, correcting our eyesight which grows old and struggles to see "the weight of glory" in each other as teenagers, adults, and perhaps especially, as old people. Even though he did not reference icons in his essay, we seem to drift very easily into what could be called a type of iconoclasm, an inability to see each other as image bearers of God Himself. William Wordsworth describes us as "trailing clouds of glory" when we first arrive here "from God, who is our home." But soon, he says, "shades of the prison-house" begin to smother us, and we forget. "We bow to grown people," says Chesterton in this same essay, "take off our hats to them, refrain from contradicting them flatly, but we do not appreciate them properly." God speaks to us, like we are working through in St. John of Damascus , through the "cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology," or literally from the spoken word (cataphatic) or unspeakable word (apophatic). Apophatic I noticed has the same root in Greek as Infant does in Latin. Both mean "unspoken." God has given us both bibles and babies, speechless wonders through which He means to unglaze our eyes and fill us with astonishment. MARK C. WATNEY is professor emeritus at Sterling College, assisting in its newly established C. S. Lewis Center. He has given papers at Harvard's Center for Hellenic Studies and Dordt College
By Michael Simmon August 25, 2026
"God became man, so that man might become God." St. Athanasius the Great, On the Incarnation (54:3)  These words from St. Athanasius may sound, at first blush, provocative. However, St. Athanasius is restating, perhaps more simply, what St. Peter says in his second epistle: the promise of being united to Christ is that men and women made in His image will partake in His divine nature (2 Peter 1:4). Paul Kingsnorth's latest book, Against the Machine, inverts this idea and opens our eyes to the world emerging at a rapid rate, the world dominated by what he calls The Machine. The new mantra of The Machine age is, instead, this: Man will become God by Man's own self-creation. Reading Kingsnorth is not for the faint of heart. It's easy to be overcome by despair. The goal of the Machine age is "transhumanism", to be liberated from the constraints of the body. For the transhumanist (self-described), the future is disembodied. The future is limitless. But this is not liberation. Because the Machine is not limited to the physical world, it follows naturally there is a spiritual nature to this lifestyle, what he ultimately identifies as a manisfestation and/or manipulation of the demonic. Whether or not you agree with his ultimate conclusion, we can see its effects. An entire generation, and many across generations, addicted to screens. Disintegration of communal life, most disastrously in the breakdown of the family. Increasing rates of loneliness, depression, and suicide, especially among children. It's clear we need a Savior, and the Machine isn't it. Instead, Kingsnorth encourages us toward a revival of community, men, women, and children living embodied lives in the same space and time: working together, eating together, worshipping together, loving each other, carrying each other's burdens. If this sounds like Eighth Day Institute...if this sounds like what the Church is meant to be, it is because this is exactly what the Church is. We are saved together in Christ. MICHAEL SIMMON currently serves as the Secretary of Eighth Day Institute Board of Directors and Coordinator for Hall of Men. He resides in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and four children.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 31, 2026
"What is it that has ordered the things of heaven and those of earth, the things which move through the air and those which move in the water; nay, rather the things which proceeded them: heaven and earth and the natures of fire and water? What is it that combined and arranged them...set them into motion and put them on their unceasing and unhindered course?..But who is the architect of these things? Or did not he who made them also bring them into being? We shall certainly not attribute such power to spontaneity." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 3 This comes after St. John of Damascus sets out to delineate between the created and the uncreated, a fact which, while at the core of existence, seems for him to be, for this very reason, the simplest to believe. Everything but God is created and, thus, susceptible to change. This means people, but this also means demons, angels, the rest of the created order across the entire cosmos. Everything is vulnerable to unrest. Except for God. If you have ever tried to explain the Holy Trinity to a child for the first time, maybe you have felt as I have the weightier, inexpressible side of God's unchangeability: how do I possibly communicate this essential fact to the person in front of me? (This is usually when my faint stutter starts to pop up again.) I like that here, like St. Patrick reaching for a three-leaf clover, St. John brings us back to earth to better understand the cosmos. Fire and water are no less mysteries than heaven and earth. And yet here we are, cooking and washing, eating and drinking, filled and sustained on what we can neither fully explain nor claim to have created. Only God is unchanging. Vice versa, God is the only constant we need. Maybe the rest is better left unsaid. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 24, 2026
"Now, one who would speak or hear about God should know beyond any doubt that in what concerns theology and the Incarnation not all things are inexpressible and not all are capable of expression, and neither are all things unknowable nor are they all knowable. That which can be known is one thing, whereas that which can be said is another, just as it is one thing to speak and another to know. Furthermore, many of those things about God which are not clearly perceived cannot be fittingly described, so that we are obliged to express in human terms things which transcend the human order. Thus, for example, in speaking about God we attribute to Him sleep, anger, indifference, hands and feet, and the like." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 2 When I was studying Fiction in graduate school, one of the first methods I learned to really situate the reader in the story you were about to tell them was disorientation; if you wanted to ground them in one story, first you had pull the rug out from under their feet. So it's fitting that in the beginning of St. John Damascene's On the Orthodox Faith, before rebuilding our foundation, he first puts us squarely in limbo, seesawing back and forth between certainty and uncertainty. To paraphrase, there is no doubt (certainty) that about God some things can be expressed...but not all things (uncertainty). Some things about God are truly knowable (certainty), but some are unknowable (uncertainty). Oh, and while we're speaking about God (certainty), let's admit there's a gap, too, between what we say and what we know (uncertainty). My favorite line in this spiraling excerpt, "...it is one thing to speak, and another to know," takes me back to the final lines in Wendell Berry's poem, "How to Be a Poet," which he wrote primarily as a reminder to himself: Accept what comes from silence. Make the best you can of it. Of the little words that come out of the silence, like prayers prayed back to the one who prays, make a poem that does not disturb the silence from which it came. Wherever your preferences fall on the cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology (whether you lean more toward what we can say about God or what we cannot), Berry's poem, I think, would nod along with St. John: before we say too much, let our words be preserved by the silence from which they came. I'm thinking of the silence, that filling, restorative quiet I feel when I step into a cathedral or in some of my favorite moments with my kids in the early hours. Even before praying, can we hear the One already praying in us? ​​​​​​​Let's start there. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Mark C. Watney July 20, 2026
Late-Night Bookstores and Spiritual Reading
By Sarah Orner July 20, 2026
On St. Benedict and the Making of Vows
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
The Pursuit of Truth in the Age of AI
By Michael Simmon July 20, 2026
On the Theology of Raising Chickens
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
G.K. Chesterton and Raising Small Children
By Fr. Mark Lovett June 9, 2026
"Seal of the Fathers"
More Posts