Eden's Cross and the Annunciation: A Monastic Half-Century

by Mark Mosley


Feast of the Holy Martyr Matrona of Thessalonica

Anno Domini 2021, March 27



1. The children of Eden—known collectively as the ground in the garden—could not see that they were naked in Eden because they were covered in a merciful garment of Light.

 

2. Though flesh, they had a pure and undefiled intention. Their hearts were chaste.

 

3. Though two persons, they were clothed in the same flesh. They both were perfect in their spirit in being One with the Creator.

 

4. In this place, they kept wrapped up in the Christ Who was “put on” them.

 

5. The person of Christ is there in Genesis in the unity of the couple.

 

6. The unity of the couple is in God’s energy of Light.

 

7. If the first miracle of Christ on earth is a marriage in Cana, then perhaps a primordial miracle of Christ in heaven is the marriage in Eden.

 

8. The cross of Christ in Eden is the sacrifice of one’s own will and desire for the sake of the Other, expressed throughout all of creation.

 

9. The tree of the forbidden is a picture not of disobedience and punishment as much as it is a tree of ascetic unexperienced self-pleasure.

 

10. The Fall is the fruition of wanting more when we have perfectly enough.

 

11. The tree of fruit is a tree of the cross when it is experienced as a sacrifice of self-will.

 

12. Divine knowledge is the necessity and goodness of pleasure not chosen.

 

13. Goodness is a will that remains spiritually, mentally, and behaviorally pure.

 

14. The heart that remains virginal has an abundant marriage to God and others.

 

15. Unity of self with God is maintained by purity of will.

 

16. The preaching of Christ crucified begins on the sixth day of creation.

 

17. If we can spend each seventh day resting in that state, then all of our days take us to the eighth day.

 

18. The two pure beings named Adam become separated into Adam and Eve when they bite of the forbidden fruit.

 

19. They are also separated when they succumb to the forbidden desire in their hearts to have a hidden and secret intention separated from each other and separated from God.

 

20. Their nakedness is revealed when they step out of the garment of Light which is the covering of Christ.

 

21. Their spiritual death is paradoxically the refusal of the cross of Christ.

 

22. In forgoing the sacrifice of the cross, they remain nailed by their own desires and pride.

 

23. Like the third thief on the cross who mocks the death of Christ, our spiritual parents said “no.”

 

24. This left no voice to proclaim: “Today you will be with me in paradise.”

 

25. This is the antithesis of the Theotokos who said “yes” to joining Christ on the cross.

 

26. In remaining chaste in intention and virginal in behavior, she becomes one with the Creator.

 

27. The cross that she bears makes her the ground for the Divine garden to be re-planted.

 

28. Her umbilical cord becomes a vine of David for a tree of everlasting life.

 

29. A “yes” to the cross unifies us to the Creator.

 

30. A “yes” to the cross unifies us to each other in the Creator’s image.

 

31. A “yes” to the cross unifies us to all of creation.

 

32. It is said by one of the Saints of the Church, “If you do not love trees, you are not a Christian.” This is not a political or scientific statement; it is simply a theology that speaks to a Creator Who is completely and beautifully experienced in creation.

 

33. Every day we re-live that day in Eden.

 

34. Every day we re-live that day when Gabriel visits Mary.

 

35. Every day we are hanging and breathing next to Jesus on Golgatha.

 

36. We can say “yes” to inhibiting our will, desires, and pleasures.

 

37. We can embrace “Christ crucified” in order that we might be crucified with Him, and not live and die “being true to our self.”

 

38. The natural man who defines his identity by what he feels lives separated and alone.

 

39. Separated Adam and Eve cannot quit seeing that they are uncovered.

 

40. While lost in the garden they keep re-making for themselves, they cannot understand why they are unable to find God.

 

41. They cannot understand why they are unable to find each other.

 

42. They cannot understand why they are unable to find love.

 

43. It is impossible for all of us not to feel naked and ashamed when we step out of the clothing of Christ’s baptismal gown.

 

44. The darkness hisses as close as a whisper to our ears when we make a decision to step out of the garment of life.

 

45. We wonder in that moment if we are hiding from God.

 

46. We wonder if He even exists.

 

47. We feel alienated from others and blame them for our struggles and predicaments.

 

48. Saying “no” to the sacrifice of pleasure puts us at war with the Creator, with His creatures, and with His creation.

 

49. Saying “yes” to a crucified life means keeping certain fruits forbidden, maintaining a difficult chastity, and continuously examining one’s own skin to see if it is covered in the Light of Christ.

 

50. Only this person feels together in the womb of God which blooms on the earth as it does in the garden of Heaven.

Share this Post on Your Preferred Platform

By Mark C. Watney • August 25, 2026
Inside the head of my three-month-old granddaughter, Lucy, said G.K. Chesterton is, "a new universe, as new as it was on the seventh day of creation...a new system of stars, new grass, new cities...and new seas." And this is because, he adds: The gravity of astonishment at the universe...dwells in the eyes of a baby three-months-old [and] the universe is put upon its trial and forces us actually to remodel our conduct...we seem to be dealing with a new race, only to be seen through a microscope...[with] delightful bulbous heads, three times too big for the body. But Chesterton's central thesis in this essay is not that babies are so marvelous, but that our treatment of each other as adults, in contrast, is so broken. "It is our attitude towards grown-up people that is wrong," he writes, because we no longer see each other with astonishment and wonder (unless, that is, we are falling in love). But babies remind us that humans really are astonishing, and this "revolutionary theory of the marvelousness of all things" should force us to "remodel our conduct" toward everyone we meet. A baby seems to be a necessary icon for us, correcting our eyesight which grows old and struggles to see "the weight of glory" in each other as teenagers, adults, and perhaps especially, as old people. Even though he did not reference icons in his essay, we seem to drift very easily into what could be called a type of iconoclasm, an inability to see each other as image bearers of God Himself. William Wordsworth describes us as "trailing clouds of glory" when we first arrive here "from God, who is our home." But soon, he says, "shades of the prison-house" begin to smother us, and we forget. "We bow to grown people," says Chesterton in this same essay, "take off our hats to them, refrain from contradicting them flatly, but we do not appreciate them properly." God speaks to us, like we are working through in St. John of Damascus , through the "cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology," or literally from the spoken word (cataphatic) or unspeakable word (apophatic). Apophatic I noticed has the same root in Greek as Infant does in Latin. Both mean "unspoken." God has given us both bibles and babies, speechless wonders through which He means to unglaze our eyes and fill us with astonishment. MARK C. WATNEY is professor emeritus at Sterling College, assisting in its newly established C. S. Lewis Center. He has given papers at Harvard's Center for Hellenic Studies and Dordt College
By Michael Simmon • August 25, 2026
"God became man, so that man might become God." St. Athanasius the Great, On the Incarnation (54:3)  These words from St. Athanasius may sound, at first blush, provocative. However, St. Athanasius is restating, perhaps more simply, what St. Peter says in his second epistle: the promise of being united to Christ is that men and women made in His image will partake in His divine nature (2 Peter 1:4). Paul Kingsnorth's latest book, Against the Machine, inverts this idea and opens our eyes to the world emerging at a rapid rate, the world dominated by what he calls The Machine. The new mantra of The Machine age is, instead, this: Man will become God by Man's own self-creation. Reading Kingsnorth is not for the faint of heart. It's easy to be overcome by despair. The goal of the Machine age is "transhumanism", to be liberated from the constraints of the body. For the transhumanist (self-described), the future is disembodied. The future is limitless. But this is not liberation. Because the Machine is not limited to the physical world, it follows naturally there is a spiritual nature to this lifestyle, what he ultimately identifies as a manisfestation and/or manipulation of the demonic. Whether or not you agree with his ultimate conclusion, we can see its effects. An entire generation, and many across generations, addicted to screens. Disintegration of communal life, most disastrously in the breakdown of the family. Increasing rates of loneliness, depression, and suicide, especially among children. It's clear we need a Savior, and the Machine isn't it. Instead, Kingsnorth encourages us toward a revival of community, men, women, and children living embodied lives in the same space and time: working together, eating together, worshipping together, loving each other, carrying each other's burdens. If this sounds like Eighth Day Institute...if this sounds like what the Church is meant to be, it is because this is exactly what the Church is. We are saved together in Christ. MICHAEL SIMMON currently serves as the Secretary of Eighth Day Institute Board of Directors and Coordinator for Hall of Men. He resides in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and four children.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap • July 31, 2026
"What is it that has ordered the things of heaven and those of earth, the things which move through the air and those which move in the water; nay, rather the things which proceeded them: heaven and earth and the natures of fire and water? What is it that combined and arranged them...set them into motion and put them on their unceasing and unhindered course?..But who is the architect of these things? Or did not he who made them also bring them into being? We shall certainly not attribute such power to spontaneity." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 3 This comes after St. John of Damascus sets out to delineate between the created and the uncreated, a fact which, while at the core of existence, seems for him to be, for this very reason, the simplest to believe. Everything but God is created and, thus, susceptible to change. This means people, but this also means demons, angels, the rest of the created order across the entire cosmos. Everything is vulnerable to unrest. Except for God. If you have ever tried to explain the Holy Trinity to a child for the first time, maybe you have felt as I have the weightier, inexpressible side of God's unchangeability: how do I possibly communicate this essential fact to the person in front of me? (This is usually when my faint stutter starts to pop up again.) I like that here, like St. Patrick reaching for a three-leaf clover, St. John brings us back to earth to better understand the cosmos. Fire and water are no less mysteries than heaven and earth. And yet here we are, cooking and washing, eating and drinking, filled and sustained on what we can neither fully explain nor claim to have created. Only God is unchanging. Vice versa, God is the only constant we need. Maybe the rest is better left unsaid. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap • July 24, 2026
"Now, one who would speak or hear about God should know beyond any doubt that in what concerns theology and the Incarnation not all things are inexpressible and not all are capable of expression, and neither are all things unknowable nor are they all knowable. That which can be known is one thing, whereas that which can be said is another, just as it is one thing to speak and another to know. Furthermore, many of those things about God which are not clearly perceived cannot be fittingly described, so that we are obliged to express in human terms things which transcend the human order. Thus, for example, in speaking about God we attribute to Him sleep, anger, indifference, hands and feet, and the like." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 2 When I was studying Fiction in graduate school, one of the first methods I learned to really situate the reader in the story you were about to tell them was disorientation; if you wanted to ground them in one story, first you had pull the rug out from under their feet. So it's fitting that in the beginning of St. John Damascene's On the Orthodox Faith, before rebuilding our foundation, he first puts us squarely in limbo, seesawing back and forth between certainty and uncertainty. To paraphrase, there is no doubt (certainty) that about God some things can be expressed...but not all things (uncertainty). Some things about God are truly knowable (certainty), but some are unknowable (uncertainty). Oh, and while we're speaking about God (certainty), let's admit there's a gap, too, between what we say and what we know (uncertainty). My favorite line in this spiraling excerpt, "...it is one thing to speak, and another to know," takes me back to the final lines in Wendell Berry's poem, "How to Be a Poet," which he wrote primarily as a reminder to himself: Accept what comes from silence. Make the best you can of it. Of the little words that come out of the silence, like prayers prayed back to the one who prays, make a poem that does not disturb the silence from which it came. Wherever your preferences fall on the cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology (whether you lean more toward what we can say about God or what we cannot), Berry's poem, I think, would nod along with St. John: before we say too much, let our words be preserved by the silence from which they came. I'm thinking of the silence, that filling, restorative quiet I feel when I step into a cathedral or in some of my favorite moments with my kids in the early hours. Even before praying, can we hear the One already praying in us? ​​​​​​​Let's start there. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Mark C. Watney • July 20, 2026
Late-Night Bookstores and Spiritual Reading
By Sarah Orner • July 20, 2026
On St. Benedict and the Making of Vows
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap • July 20, 2026
The Pursuit of Truth in the Age of AI
By Michael Simmon • July 20, 2026
On the Theology of Raising Chickens
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap • July 20, 2026
G.K. Chesterton and Raising Small Children
By Fr. Mark Lovett • June 9, 2026
"Seal of the Fathers"
More Posts