Good Friday

A Reflection by Joseph of Arimathea

ENGLAND was once an intensely Christian country, and longed to have Christ’s presence—His physical presence as Man and God—made real in England. As the early 19th century poet William Blake—an eccentric believer, to be sure—plaintively questioned: “And did those feet in ancient time, walk upon England’s mountains green? And was the holy Lamb of God on England’s pleasant pastures seen?”

Blake was putting into verse the ancient legend that Christ had actually visited Britain, as it then was, accompanying his uncle (legend) Joseph of Arimathea, who was a tin merchant (legend), and member of the Jewish council, the Sanhedrin (fact), who gave his own tomb as a resting place for the crucified Christ (fact).

The connection? Tin was mined and smelted in the south-west tribal area of Britain—known as Dumnonia then and as Cornwall and Devon today, the pointy tail on the lower left corner of Britain. That connection was enough for the mediaeval imagination; let it be enough for our imaginations as well, as we listen to what Joseph of Arimathea “might could” have said, just after Christ’s body was taken down from the cross, in this piece of speculative historical fiction.


Pause. Slow tempo. Drop pitch.

YOU MAY be wondering why I was planning to make that journey from Israel to Britain, almost two decades ago. Why indeed. I didn’t need the money, and as a member of the Sanhedrin I was expected to stay in Jerusalem, study the Law and the Prophets, and hear cases.

You might also ask how I came to join the highest court in Israel. I was born into a prominent family, and my international trading in tin and other metals gave me some skills in the laws of trade, on which I made several judgments. But what I genuinely loved was learning about God and the Torah from learned rabbis. And what I genuinely hated was learning about clever ways to avoid the spirit of all laws—justice, peace, mercy and humility before God—from worldly rabbis.

To get back to your question about the trip to Britain: it was several bad experiences with those worldly rabbis that forced me back to the ships again. To avoid scandal, the excuse I made to family and friends was that I was owner of a fleet, and it was time I went.

You may also be wondering why I took Jesus on the journey. It was because of my niece Mary, His mother, who asked me to take Him on the voyage I was planning. “I think He’s feeling cooped up in Galilee. I’d like Him to see the kingdoms of the world—and all their glory,” she added with a chuckle. “Not that He would ever be tempted by them. He’s a fine young craftsman and loves His tools and the Law.” She paused and then continued in a more serious tone: “And I’d like to see Him get away from Rome’s power for a while.” She always was nervous about Rome—nervous about its power in that serene manner in which she always expressed her anxieties; she would touch her side gently as though warding off pain, whenever the subject came up.

You will recall that Tiberius had just become Emperor that year, after the long and relatively quiet reign of Augustus—and who knew how he would act? He had been a successful general and governor, and so Tiberius was more than qualified to be Emperor. But we Jews have been carefully taught not to put our trust in princes.

Now, let me tell you about that trip. Jesus was a remarkable young man. He never got seasick, and He had none of that terror of the sea—or even of a stormy lake—that assails most of us Jews whenever we get into a boat. Out on the open sea, He eagerly climbed the ropes to the cross beam to trim the sails, as though He were crew and not the nephew of the commander of the fleet—a true servant.

The winds on the Mediterranean and Atlantic had been tame—even tamed, it seemed—and we arrived safely. Southwest Britain, where the tin miners live, crashes into the ocean; the hills are just as rugged as ours in Israel, but darker and wetter, and the land is green and pleasant. Jesus loved those hills, as He loved all things beautiful. As we approached landfall, He recited the psalm as if He had written it: “I will lift up my eyes to the hills. From where does my help come? My help comes from the Lord, who made heaven and earth.”

Not that He had His head in the clouds. No indeed. He took a lively interest in the ways that the ore was smelted, and remarked on several small, smooth, and unmarked coin-shaped ingots of tin: “Look, Uncle Joseph—perfect coins for Jews—no image or inscription. Who can you pay taxes to with these?” He said with a laugh.

That, I say, was nearly twenty years ago. You know what happened since then: the years of obscurity, then His baptism, His ministry and miracles, the kingdom of God breaking through. And the jealousy of the worldly rabbis, and that rigged trial before the Sanhedrin. My friend and I protested. Nicodemus cried out: “I curse this decision! I will have no part in this shameful judgement in blood.” And I shouted to their deaf ears: “I too will leave this Council, where innocence is murdered” (cf. The Oberammergau Passion Play , 1984).

I’ll not run away from scandal this time.

I defy them. I’ll not let them throw His body into a nameless unmarked grave. I give Mary my tomb for Her son. Let Him take my place in death.


Holy Friday (West)
Anno Domini 2019, April 19


Michael Mates was converted to Christ at St Luke’s Episcopal Church, Seattle. He holds a BA and MA (Greek and Latin) from the University of Washington, and a PhD (Church History) from Fuller Theological Seminary; his dissertation examined the British Church from St Patrick to Gildas, and has earned nothing in royalties. After teaching English at the International School of Islamabad, he joined the U.S. Department of State, serving mostly as a political analyst in Pakistan, Australia, Romania, and Moldova—and a brief posting in Washington DC.

He retired in 2011, gardens in Monroe WA, and worships at Peace Lutheran.



Share this Post on Your Preferred Platform

By Mark C. Watney August 25, 2026
Inside the head of my three-month-old granddaughter, Lucy, said G.K. Chesterton is, "a new universe, as new as it was on the seventh day of creation...a new system of stars, new grass, new cities...and new seas." And this is because, he adds: The gravity of astonishment at the universe...dwells in the eyes of a baby three-months-old [and] the universe is put upon its trial and forces us actually to remodel our conduct...we seem to be dealing with a new race, only to be seen through a microscope...[with] delightful bulbous heads, three times too big for the body. But Chesterton's central thesis in this essay is not that babies are so marvelous, but that our treatment of each other as adults, in contrast, is so broken. "It is our attitude towards grown-up people that is wrong," he writes, because we no longer see each other with astonishment and wonder (unless, that is, we are falling in love). But babies remind us that humans really are astonishing, and this "revolutionary theory of the marvelousness of all things" should force us to "remodel our conduct" toward everyone we meet. A baby seems to be a necessary icon for us, correcting our eyesight which grows old and struggles to see "the weight of glory" in each other as teenagers, adults, and perhaps especially, as old people. Even though he did not reference icons in his essay, we seem to drift very easily into what could be called a type of iconoclasm, an inability to see each other as image bearers of God Himself. William Wordsworth describes us as "trailing clouds of glory" when we first arrive here "from God, who is our home." But soon, he says, "shades of the prison-house" begin to smother us, and we forget. "We bow to grown people," says Chesterton in this same essay, "take off our hats to them, refrain from contradicting them flatly, but we do not appreciate them properly." God speaks to us, like we are working through in St. John of Damascus , through the "cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology," or literally from the spoken word (cataphatic) or unspeakable word (apophatic). Apophatic I noticed has the same root in Greek as Infant does in Latin. Both mean "unspoken." God has given us both bibles and babies, speechless wonders through which He means to unglaze our eyes and fill us with astonishment. MARK C. WATNEY is professor emeritus at Sterling College, assisting in its newly established C. S. Lewis Center. He has given papers at Harvard's Center for Hellenic Studies and Dordt College
By Michael Simmon August 25, 2026
"God became man, so that man might become God." St. Athanasius the Great, On the Incarnation (54:3)  These words from St. Athanasius may sound, at first blush, provocative. However, St. Athanasius is restating, perhaps more simply, what St. Peter says in his second epistle: the promise of being united to Christ is that men and women made in His image will partake in His divine nature (2 Peter 1:4). Paul Kingsnorth's latest book, Against the Machine, inverts this idea and opens our eyes to the world emerging at a rapid rate, the world dominated by what he calls The Machine. The new mantra of The Machine age is, instead, this: Man will become God by Man's own self-creation. Reading Kingsnorth is not for the faint of heart. It's easy to be overcome by despair. The goal of the Machine age is "transhumanism", to be liberated from the constraints of the body. For the transhumanist (self-described), the future is disembodied. The future is limitless. But this is not liberation. Because the Machine is not limited to the physical world, it follows naturally there is a spiritual nature to this lifestyle, what he ultimately identifies as a manisfestation and/or manipulation of the demonic. Whether or not you agree with his ultimate conclusion, we can see its effects. An entire generation, and many across generations, addicted to screens. Disintegration of communal life, most disastrously in the breakdown of the family. Increasing rates of loneliness, depression, and suicide, especially among children. It's clear we need a Savior, and the Machine isn't it. Instead, Kingsnorth encourages us toward a revival of community, men, women, and children living embodied lives in the same space and time: working together, eating together, worshipping together, loving each other, carrying each other's burdens. If this sounds like Eighth Day Institute...if this sounds like what the Church is meant to be, it is because this is exactly what the Church is. We are saved together in Christ. MICHAEL SIMMON currently serves as the Secretary of Eighth Day Institute Board of Directors and Coordinator for Hall of Men. He resides in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and four children.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 31, 2026
"What is it that has ordered the things of heaven and those of earth, the things which move through the air and those which move in the water; nay, rather the things which proceeded them: heaven and earth and the natures of fire and water? What is it that combined and arranged them...set them into motion and put them on their unceasing and unhindered course?..But who is the architect of these things? Or did not he who made them also bring them into being? We shall certainly not attribute such power to spontaneity." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 3 This comes after St. John of Damascus sets out to delineate between the created and the uncreated, a fact which, while at the core of existence, seems for him to be, for this very reason, the simplest to believe. Everything but God is created and, thus, susceptible to change. This means people, but this also means demons, angels, the rest of the created order across the entire cosmos. Everything is vulnerable to unrest. Except for God. If you have ever tried to explain the Holy Trinity to a child for the first time, maybe you have felt as I have the weightier, inexpressible side of God's unchangeability: how do I possibly communicate this essential fact to the person in front of me? (This is usually when my faint stutter starts to pop up again.) I like that here, like St. Patrick reaching for a three-leaf clover, St. John brings us back to earth to better understand the cosmos. Fire and water are no less mysteries than heaven and earth. And yet here we are, cooking and washing, eating and drinking, filled and sustained on what we can neither fully explain nor claim to have created. Only God is unchanging. Vice versa, God is the only constant we need. Maybe the rest is better left unsaid. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 24, 2026
"Now, one who would speak or hear about God should know beyond any doubt that in what concerns theology and the Incarnation not all things are inexpressible and not all are capable of expression, and neither are all things unknowable nor are they all knowable. That which can be known is one thing, whereas that which can be said is another, just as it is one thing to speak and another to know. Furthermore, many of those things about God which are not clearly perceived cannot be fittingly described, so that we are obliged to express in human terms things which transcend the human order. Thus, for example, in speaking about God we attribute to Him sleep, anger, indifference, hands and feet, and the like." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 2 When I was studying Fiction in graduate school, one of the first methods I learned to really situate the reader in the story you were about to tell them was disorientation; if you wanted to ground them in one story, first you had pull the rug out from under their feet. So it's fitting that in the beginning of St. John Damascene's On the Orthodox Faith, before rebuilding our foundation, he first puts us squarely in limbo, seesawing back and forth between certainty and uncertainty. To paraphrase, there is no doubt (certainty) that about God some things can be expressed...but not all things (uncertainty). Some things about God are truly knowable (certainty), but some are unknowable (uncertainty). Oh, and while we're speaking about God (certainty), let's admit there's a gap, too, between what we say and what we know (uncertainty). My favorite line in this spiraling excerpt, "...it is one thing to speak, and another to know," takes me back to the final lines in Wendell Berry's poem, "How to Be a Poet," which he wrote primarily as a reminder to himself: Accept what comes from silence. Make the best you can of it. Of the little words that come out of the silence, like prayers prayed back to the one who prays, make a poem that does not disturb the silence from which it came. Wherever your preferences fall on the cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology (whether you lean more toward what we can say about God or what we cannot), Berry's poem, I think, would nod along with St. John: before we say too much, let our words be preserved by the silence from which they came. I'm thinking of the silence, that filling, restorative quiet I feel when I step into a cathedral or in some of my favorite moments with my kids in the early hours. Even before praying, can we hear the One already praying in us? ​​​​​​​Let's start there. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Mark C. Watney July 20, 2026
Late-Night Bookstores and Spiritual Reading
By Sarah Orner July 20, 2026
On St. Benedict and the Making of Vows
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
The Pursuit of Truth in the Age of AI
By Michael Simmon July 20, 2026
On the Theology of Raising Chickens
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
G.K. Chesterton and Raising Small Children
By Fr. Mark Lovett June 9, 2026
"Seal of the Fathers"
More Posts