Pain, Suffering, and Resurrection
by Erin Doom
Feast of SS Peter and Paul, Bishops of Nicaea
Anno Domini 2020, September 10

1. Bible and the Fathers: “A Discourse on the Resurrection: Excerpts” by St. Methodius of Olympus
Thursday: Gal. 1:1-3, 20-24; 2:1-5. Jn. 3:16-21. Online here.
Friday: Gal. 2:6-10. Jn. 12:19-36. Online here.
Saturday: 1 Cor. 2:6-9. Matt. 10:37-42, 11:1. Online here.
We just celebrated the Feast of the Nativity of the Theotokos (Sep. 8), which our patron St John of Damascus has described as “the nativity of joy for the whole world.” Why? Because it was through her that “the Creator transformed all nature into a better state by means of humanity. For if a human being stands between mind and matter, since he is the bond between all visible and invisible creation, the creative Word of God, having become unified with the nature of humanity, was unified through it with the whole of creation” ("An Oration on the Nativity of the Holy Theotokos Mary").
This coming Monday, September 14, we’ll celebrate the Elevation of the Venerable and Life-Giving Cross. You can read an explanation of this feast here. Since Sunday’s edition of Synaxis
will thus offer a couple reflections on the cross, today’s edition of Microsynaxis
offers an excerpt from an ancient discourse on the resurrection by St. Methodius of Olympus (d. c. A.D. 311; commemorated on June 20). Here’s a teaser:
But if any one were to think that the earthy image is the flesh itself, but the heavenly image some other spiritual body besides the flesh, let him first consider that Christ, the heavenly man, when He appeared, bore the same form of limbs and the same image of flesh as ours, through which also He, who was not man, became man, that “as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive” (1 Cor. 15:22). For if He bore flesh for any other reason than that of setting the flesh free, and raising it up, why did He bear flesh superfluously, as He purposed neither to save it, nor to raise it up? But the Son of God does nothing superfluously. He did not then take the form of a servant uselessly, but to raise it up and save it. For He truly was made man, and died, and not in mere appearance, but that He might truly be shown to be the first begotten from the dead, changing the earthy into the heavenly, and the mortal into the immortal.
2. Books & Culture: Resurrecting Jesus: The Earliest Christian Tradition and Its Interpreters
by Dale C. Allison, Jr.
Dale Allison is a native Wichitan. Over thirty years ago, he helped Warren Farha birth Eighth Day Books. He’s brilliant and he has published many books, including this one on the resurrection. For Eighth Day book reviews, this one is longer than normal and rightfully so. And it’s more personal, penned by Allison’s good friend Warren Farha. Here’s a small snippet:
This book is a collection of six essays, including “Secularizing Jesus,” a deconstruction of the commonly accepted schematic of “three quests” for the historical Jesus; “The Problem of Audience,” grappling with the interpretation of some of the “difficult sayings” of Jesus; “The Problem of Gehenna,” a biblical and historical catalog and critique of interpretations of the doctrine of everlasting punishment of the damned in hell; and the book-length centerpiece of the collection, “Resurrecting Jesus.” It is here that the historical convictions of the author and those of his readers might collide. Dale Allison is the epitome of intellectual honesty—he explores the purely historical-critical approach to Jesus to its limits, and to the limits of his own profoundly moving experience of death and its aftermath.
Read the entire review here. And save your pennies to eventually purchase this book from Eighth Day Books.
3. Essays et al: “A Movement of Stone” by Mark Mosley
As we approach the anniversary of 9-11 tomorrow—during a pandemic—the theme of pain and suffering is worth considering. Here are a couple of paragraphs from Dr. Mosley’s most recent piece, as he reflects on how 9-11, the Great Recession of 2008, and the viral pandemic of 2020 have transformed our culture’s approach to pain and suffering:
Modern American culture is extremely ambivalent about the place of suffering. The value of suffering is not presumed; it is outright rejected. The current ethos of “It is wrong to not be happy” is social dogma. So when more suffering occurs, it demands an even more desperate need for moral dialogue, law and order. The pursuit of happiness becomes a social and political responsibility.
In contrast, the highest forms of art and religion have been the traditional modes by which a culture finds meaning in pain and suffering. Pain is the physical representation and suffering is the psychic representation which challenge the moral precepts of fairness, equality, and justice. Pain and suffering are not aggrandized. No one is suggesting moral masochism. They are accepted as facts of human existence. The Christian understanding of the cross is the prime example, both in art and religion, of how Western culture in particular expressed meaning in pain and suffering.
*If you’d like to receive the Digital Synaxis in your inbox on Thursdays and Sundays, you can subscribe here. Sign up and we'll send you a digital version of our vert first publication, back in 2012: Synaxis: The Book.
**All books (and icons) in print available from Eighth Day Books. Please support an independent bookstore that believes in the eighth day resurrection of our God and Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Give them a call at 1.800.841.2541 or visit their website here. And don’t forget Eighth Day Members (Patrons+) receive 10% discount, plus many other perks! Learn more and become a member here.
Share this Post on Your Preferred Platform

"What is it that has ordered the things of heaven and those of earth, the things which move through the air and those which move in the water; nay, rather the things which proceeded them: heaven and earth and the natures of fire and water? What is it that combined and arranged them...set them into motion and put them on their unceasing and unhindered course?..But who is the architect of these things? Or did not he who made them also bring them into being? We shall certainly not attribute such power to spontaneity." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 3 This comes after St. John of Damascus sets out to delineate between the created and the uncreated, a fact which, while at the core of existence, seems for him to be, for this very reason, the simplest to believe. Everything but God is created and, thus, susceptible to change. This means people, but this also means demons, angels, the rest of the created order across the entire cosmos. Everything is vulnerable to unrest. Except for God. If you have ever tried to explain the Holy Trinity to a child for the first time, maybe you have felt as I have the weightier, inexpressible side of God's unchangeability: how do I possibly communicate this essential fact to the person in front of me? (This is usually when my faint stutter starts to pop up again.) I like that here, like St. Patrick reaching for a three-leaf clover, St. John brings us back to earth to better understand the cosmos. Fire and water are no less mysteries than heaven and earth. And yet here we are, cooking and washing, eating and drinking, filled and sustained on what we can neither fully explain nor claim to have created. Only God is unchanging. Vice versa, God is the only constant we need. Maybe the rest is better left unsaid. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.

"Now, one who would speak or hear about God should know beyond any doubt that in what concerns theology and the Incarnation not all things are inexpressible and not all are capable of expression, and neither are all things unknowable nor are they all knowable. That which can be known is one thing, whereas that which can be said is another, just as it is one thing to speak and another to know. Furthermore, many of those things about God which are not clearly perceived cannot be fittingly described, so that we are obliged to express in human terms things which transcend the human order. Thus, for example, in speaking about God we attribute to Him sleep, anger, indifference, hands and feet, and the like." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 2 When I was studying Fiction in graduate school, one of the first methods I learned to really situate the reader in the story you were about to tell them was disorientation; if you wanted to ground them in one story, first you had pull the rug out from under their feet. So it's fitting that in the beginning of St. John Damascene's On the Orthodox Faith, before rebuilding our foundation, he first puts us squarely in limbo, seesawing back and forth between certainty and uncertainty. To paraphrase, there is no doubt (certainty) that about God some things can be expressed...but not all things (uncertainty). Some things about God are truly knowable (certainty), but some are unknowable (uncertainty). Oh, and while we're speaking about God (certainty), let's admit there's a gap, too, between what we say and what we know (uncertainty). My favorite line in this spiraling excerpt, "...it is one thing to speak, and another to know," takes me back to the final lines in Wendell Berry's poem, "How to Be a Poet," which he wrote primarily as a reminder to himself: Accept what comes from silence. Make the best you can of it. Of the little words that come out of the silence, like prayers prayed back to the one who prays, make a poem that does not disturb the silence from which it came. Wherever your preferences fall on the cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology (whether you lean more toward what we can say about God or what we cannot), Berry's poem, I think, would nod along with St. John: before we say too much, let our words be preserved by the silence from which they came. I'm thinking of the silence, that filling, restorative quiet I feel when I step into a cathedral or in some of my favorite moments with my kids in the early hours. Even before praying, can we hear the One already praying in us? Let's start there. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.









