The Dread Terror of Baptism

by Matthew Umbarger


Feast of St Macrina, Grandmother of St Basil the Great

Anno Domini 2021, May 30


Baptism of St Paul by Ananias of Damascus


Perhaps it was the summer of 1980. I know that I was extremely young, maybe five years old. We were still sitting in Thayer Christian Church’s old, white building on Main Street, the one that was torn down decades ago. The service had virtually ended. I was antsy and restless, because I knew that when we had sung a hymn after the sermon, I could usually get out of the pew and run around a bit. But this Sunday was different. An older child, a girl who was always kind to me, walked up the aisle. Now I was curious. What was she doing?


Our minister said a few words of explanation. The girl (Mary, we’ll call her) had been to church camp that week and had decided to make a commitment to become a Christian. This morning, Mary would be baptized. And then, our minister’s tone deepened, and he became grave as he pronounced: “In a few minutes, Mary will be buried with Christ in baptism. And when she comes up out of the water, she will be a new creation. The old Mary will be dead and gone.”


I was horrified. And yet, everyone around me seemed to be filled with joy. What madness was this? The kind, elderly folks in the pews all around me were beaming in anticipation of the murder about to take place. Even Mary was smiling. My mother tried to make sure that I could get a good view, but I wasn’t sure that I wanted to watch.

The dreadful minutes unfolded in all of the slowness that childhood temporality creeps. The congregation sang all four verses of a worn-out hymn. Mary had to change into her baptismal gown, of course. So I had time in which to grow more anxious. I squirmed and shivered. My head was sweating. I contemplated television heroics, intervening somehow to save Mary. I wanted to scream.

Finally, Mary reappeared at the front of the church, in the baptistry, as though emerging onto a stage for a surreal drama. Her father was with her. Her father! Would he, then,
be the instrument of Mary’s destruction? He was smiling. So was she.

He solicited her confession of faith. Yes, she believed that “Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the Living God.” And then he took her hands in his right hand, covered up her nose and mouth with them, and pushed her backwards into the water of the baptistry. I thought that she must drown in there. Hadn’t the preacher said something about “a watery grave”?

But then she was back up, smiling, and hugging her father. I was confused. She looked very much alive. Was it then no more than a bath? But everyone was behaving as though something very significant had just occurred.

In a few more years, I myself was ready to follow Mary into the baptistry. I didn’t understand everything, and my motives were not ideal. I was a sensitive boy of seven years old, and I was terrified of going to hell, after attending a vacation Bible school full of fire and brimstone preaching. When I came home afterwards, my parents arranged a visit with our minister, John Presko (may his memory be for a blessing), because I was a quivering mess. Brother Presko’s solution for my fear was simple and direct: you need to be born again in the waters of baptism. Then you will be bound for heaven and have no need to worry about going to hell.

I begged for my parents to have me baptized as soon as possible. The date was set (I think it was Sunday, August 12, 1984). I fretted during the few days that I had to wait for baptism, worried that some accident would befall me, and I would wind up damned after all. Finally, the day arrived, and my father did the honors, in water that chilled me to the bone.

Terror of hell compelled me into those cold waters. But I can remember another dread gripping me. I was only seven years old, but I took very seriously what was about to happen. And part of that was a death. I had since seen others besides Mary get baptized. I knew that physically, at least, they were all happy and whole afterwards. But I had the profound faith of a child in the words of Scripture, and Brother Presko had read with me only a few days before these words from Romans 6:

 

3. Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death? 4. We were buried therefore with Him by baptism into death, so that as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life.

I wanted that “newness of life.” But I shuddered when I contemplated that it required death, of some sort, to get there. Everyone seemed to stress the happy results of baptism. But if those were real, the death was, too. And naturally enough, I didn’t want to die.


But into the water I went, and up from the water I came, apparently safe and sound. I can remember my father asking for my good confession. I can remember his rough hands covering my face and pushing me under. I can remember the hug in the water afterwards. I can remember hurriedly drying off and receiving congratulations in the foyer. It was all relatively painless. So much for death.

 

These days I am tempted to laugh at this naïve version of myself. Except on spiritually lucid days, when I realize that my adult sight is dulled and can no longer clearly perceive the realities conveyed in these metaphorical symbols. There is a reason that St. Paul chooses the terrible metaphor of death and burial for baptism, one that projects itself beyond the simple truth of ending one way of life and beginning another. Baptism is an execution of the old, fleshly humanity and its inherited concupiscence. Baptism doesn’t just end a pre-Christian life; it puts an end to living for one’s self.


Baptism doesn’t hurt. Unlike physical death, the suffering of baptismal death follows after. But it indeed follows. Because the old, dead, sinful humanity, like a zombie emerging from the grave, insists on asserting its authority against that of the Lord.

The New Testament uses the metaphor of death in other places. St. Paul famously tells us that he has been “crucified with Christ” in Galatians 2:

 

19. For I through the law died to the law, that I might live to God. 20. I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me; and the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.


Paul’s disciple, St. Luke, records Jesus’ instruction to “carry our cross daily.”

 

23. And he said to all, “If any man would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me. 24. For whoever would save his life will lose it; and whoever loses his life for my sake, he will save it. 25. For what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world and loses or forfeits himself?” (Luke 9:23-25).

 

Those passages obviously have something to do with one another. For Christ to live mystically in me means that I have to die. That happened in Baptism. And yet, it still has to happen again. My zombie-self has to be executed routinely on the cross I carry as I follow Jesus.

This ongoing execution takes place by virtue of that same Baptism. The only way for the ongoing process of self-immolation to proceed is by revisiting our Baptismal promises.

 

For the historical Church, at least, we actually refer to the Sacrament of Confession as a “second Baptism.” (See, for instance, Pope Francis’s comments from his general audience on November 13, 2013, “Confession Is Like a Second Baptism.”) We also re- encounter our Baptism liturgically in various fashions through the Church year, especially on Easter, when the priest sprinkles the congregation with holy water. In a lesser sense, the regular, devotional use of holy water does the same thing.

 

These are important, grace-giving gifts, whose significance I dare not diminish. But there is a more fundamental aspect of living our Baptism that we all must come to terms with. Spiritual events happen within historical time, but they are not bound by it. Baptism is efficacious because it actually brings the baptized into union with Jesus’ Baptism in the Jordan, with His Passion on the Cross, with His burial in the Tomb, and with His Resurrection. It is supra-temporal because Jesus’ divine nature is supra-temporal. And here is the marvelous thing. Because it is supra-temporal in respect to Jesus’ life in historical time, it is also supra-temporal in respect to my own life in historical time. It’s not so much that I was baptized. I am baptized. I was baptized on August 12, 1984. But that is an ongoing reality to which I return in prayer, time and again.

In the same letter that Paul talks of being buried with Christ in His death, he describes this death as an ongoing, present-tense process: “if you live according to the flesh you will die, but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body you will live” (Rom. 8:13). The only way this can happen is through the grace of Baptism. The “deeds of the body,” the zombie-self, keeps crawling out of the grave. By claiming the promise of our Baptism over and over, we kick it back in, submerging it purposefully in the death we died with Jesus; nay, in the death we are dying with Jesus.

Baptism is scary business. It is death. Death is never pleasant. Baptism is joyous, but God save us from treating it as a sentimental, nice event. It is the beginning of a life of suffering. It is the execution of the fleshly self.

Share this Post on Your Preferred Platform

By Mark C. Watney August 25, 2026
Inside the head of my three-month-old granddaughter, Lucy, said G.K. Chesterton is, "a new universe, as new as it was on the seventh day of creation...a new system of stars, new grass, new cities...and new seas." And this is because, he adds: The gravity of astonishment at the universe...dwells in the eyes of a baby three-months-old [and] the universe is put upon its trial and forces us actually to remodel our conduct...we seem to be dealing with a new race, only to be seen through a microscope...[with] delightful bulbous heads, three times too big for the body. But Chesterton's central thesis in this essay is not that babies are so marvelous, but that our treatment of each other as adults, in contrast, is so broken. "It is our attitude towards grown-up people that is wrong," he writes, because we no longer see each other with astonishment and wonder (unless, that is, we are falling in love). But babies remind us that humans really are astonishing, and this "revolutionary theory of the marvelousness of all things" should force us to "remodel our conduct" toward everyone we meet. A baby seems to be a necessary icon for us, correcting our eyesight which grows old and struggles to see "the weight of glory" in each other as teenagers, adults, and perhaps especially, as old people. Even though he did not reference icons in his essay, we seem to drift very easily into what could be called a type of iconoclasm, an inability to see each other as image bearers of God Himself. William Wordsworth describes us as "trailing clouds of glory" when we first arrive here "from God, who is our home." But soon, he says, "shades of the prison-house" begin to smother us, and we forget. "We bow to grown people," says Chesterton in this same essay, "take off our hats to them, refrain from contradicting them flatly, but we do not appreciate them properly." God speaks to us, like we are working through in St. John of Damascus , through the "cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology," or literally from the spoken word (cataphatic) or unspeakable word (apophatic). Apophatic I noticed has the same root in Greek as Infant does in Latin. Both mean "unspoken." God has given us both bibles and babies, speechless wonders through which He means to unglaze our eyes and fill us with astonishment. MARK C. WATNEY is professor emeritus at Sterling College, assisting in its newly established C. S. Lewis Center. He has given papers at Harvard's Center for Hellenic Studies and Dordt College
By Michael Simmon August 25, 2026
"God became man, so that man might become God." St. Athanasius the Great, On the Incarnation (54:3)  These words from St. Athanasius may sound, at first blush, provocative. However, St. Athanasius is restating, perhaps more simply, what St. Peter says in his second epistle: the promise of being united to Christ is that men and women made in His image will partake in His divine nature (2 Peter 1:4). Paul Kingsnorth's latest book, Against the Machine, inverts this idea and opens our eyes to the world emerging at a rapid rate, the world dominated by what he calls The Machine. The new mantra of The Machine age is, instead, this: Man will become God by Man's own self-creation. Reading Kingsnorth is not for the faint of heart. It's easy to be overcome by despair. The goal of the Machine age is "transhumanism", to be liberated from the constraints of the body. For the transhumanist (self-described), the future is disembodied. The future is limitless. But this is not liberation. Because the Machine is not limited to the physical world, it follows naturally there is a spiritual nature to this lifestyle, what he ultimately identifies as a manisfestation and/or manipulation of the demonic. Whether or not you agree with his ultimate conclusion, we can see its effects. An entire generation, and many across generations, addicted to screens. Disintegration of communal life, most disastrously in the breakdown of the family. Increasing rates of loneliness, depression, and suicide, especially among children. It's clear we need a Savior, and the Machine isn't it. Instead, Kingsnorth encourages us toward a revival of community, men, women, and children living embodied lives in the same space and time: working together, eating together, worshipping together, loving each other, carrying each other's burdens. If this sounds like Eighth Day Institute...if this sounds like what the Church is meant to be, it is because this is exactly what the Church is. We are saved together in Christ. MICHAEL SIMMON currently serves as the Secretary of Eighth Day Institute Board of Directors and Coordinator for Hall of Men. He resides in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and four children.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 31, 2026
"What is it that has ordered the things of heaven and those of earth, the things which move through the air and those which move in the water; nay, rather the things which proceeded them: heaven and earth and the natures of fire and water? What is it that combined and arranged them...set them into motion and put them on their unceasing and unhindered course?..But who is the architect of these things? Or did not he who made them also bring them into being? We shall certainly not attribute such power to spontaneity." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 3 This comes after St. John of Damascus sets out to delineate between the created and the uncreated, a fact which, while at the core of existence, seems for him to be, for this very reason, the simplest to believe. Everything but God is created and, thus, susceptible to change. This means people, but this also means demons, angels, the rest of the created order across the entire cosmos. Everything is vulnerable to unrest. Except for God. If you have ever tried to explain the Holy Trinity to a child for the first time, maybe you have felt as I have the weightier, inexpressible side of God's unchangeability: how do I possibly communicate this essential fact to the person in front of me? (This is usually when my faint stutter starts to pop up again.) I like that here, like St. Patrick reaching for a three-leaf clover, St. John brings us back to earth to better understand the cosmos. Fire and water are no less mysteries than heaven and earth. And yet here we are, cooking and washing, eating and drinking, filled and sustained on what we can neither fully explain nor claim to have created. Only God is unchanging. Vice versa, God is the only constant we need. Maybe the rest is better left unsaid. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 24, 2026
"Now, one who would speak or hear about God should know beyond any doubt that in what concerns theology and the Incarnation not all things are inexpressible and not all are capable of expression, and neither are all things unknowable nor are they all knowable. That which can be known is one thing, whereas that which can be said is another, just as it is one thing to speak and another to know. Furthermore, many of those things about God which are not clearly perceived cannot be fittingly described, so that we are obliged to express in human terms things which transcend the human order. Thus, for example, in speaking about God we attribute to Him sleep, anger, indifference, hands and feet, and the like." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 2 When I was studying Fiction in graduate school, one of the first methods I learned to really situate the reader in the story you were about to tell them was disorientation; if you wanted to ground them in one story, first you had pull the rug out from under their feet. So it's fitting that in the beginning of St. John Damascene's On the Orthodox Faith, before rebuilding our foundation, he first puts us squarely in limbo, seesawing back and forth between certainty and uncertainty. To paraphrase, there is no doubt (certainty) that about God some things can be expressed...but not all things (uncertainty). Some things about God are truly knowable (certainty), but some are unknowable (uncertainty). Oh, and while we're speaking about God (certainty), let's admit there's a gap, too, between what we say and what we know (uncertainty). My favorite line in this spiraling excerpt, "...it is one thing to speak, and another to know," takes me back to the final lines in Wendell Berry's poem, "How to Be a Poet," which he wrote primarily as a reminder to himself: Accept what comes from silence. Make the best you can of it. Of the little words that come out of the silence, like prayers prayed back to the one who prays, make a poem that does not disturb the silence from which it came. Wherever your preferences fall on the cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology (whether you lean more toward what we can say about God or what we cannot), Berry's poem, I think, would nod along with St. John: before we say too much, let our words be preserved by the silence from which they came. I'm thinking of the silence, that filling, restorative quiet I feel when I step into a cathedral or in some of my favorite moments with my kids in the early hours. Even before praying, can we hear the One already praying in us? ​​​​​​​Let's start there. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Mark C. Watney July 20, 2026
Late-Night Bookstores and Spiritual Reading
By Sarah Orner July 20, 2026
On St. Benedict and the Making of Vows
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
The Pursuit of Truth in the Age of AI
By Michael Simmon July 20, 2026
On the Theology of Raising Chickens
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
G.K. Chesterton and Raising Small Children
By Fr. Mark Lovett June 9, 2026
"Seal of the Fathers"
More Posts